Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Playing the Tupperware is Now an Art: Style Analysis of Dave Barry’s Bang the Tupperware Slowly



            Dave Barry mocks the over glorified profession of music and dance in his satirical article, “Bang the Tupperware Slowly”.  Barry uses contrasting tones, satire, and similes to subtly encourage his readers to understand that music is not a career to be impressed by.  His blunt usage of these rhetorical strategies creates a sense of pathos that is not obvious at first.  Barry merely hints and alludes, through his humorously sarcastic tones, that a musical career is not one to be proud of. 

            A tone of importance and suspense is created when Barry regally recounts his short lived Tupperware fame.  At the Tupperware party where Barry’s song was originally unveiled “the song was a large hit,” though “after the party it pretty much languished”.  As Barry is describing the unfortunate fact that his Tupperware song was a “one hit wonder,” he creates a tone that is far too serious for the occasion.  By creating such a tone, Barry is able to show his audience what a joke he considers musicians to be.  However, Barry does this in an inoffensive manner by creating a humorous atmosphere through his stark contrast in the serious tone of a not-so-serious situation.  When Barry and his band arrived at the “Tupperware convention center [they] became a tad nervous” for several reasons: many more people were in the audience than they had thought there would be, and they had never practiced as a band together, because they were too busy “deciding that [their] band outfits should include sunglasses.”  Barry once again creates a tone that does not match the situation at hand in an effort to describe the mediocrity of the music industry.  By creating this contrast of tone he points out that too many artists today sacrifice their music for their image.  He also depicts the music profession as an easy endeavor that does not require skill or practice or rhythm.

            Regardless of what article Barry is writing, his main rhetorical strategy is always his use of sarcasm to degrade the ways of society in some form or fashion.  Barry says that “[he] chose the members [of his band] very carefully”, however, Barry goes on to say that the members were chosen based on “their ability to correctly answer the following question:  Do you want to go to Orlando at your own expense and perform before Tupperware distributors?”  This sentence alone shows just how sarcastic Barry is in his writing.  He chooses his band members based on their loose wallets and not their ability, thus casting even more doubt on the issue of the legitimacy of the music industry.  Barry mainly achieves this sense of illegitimacy through his sarcastic wit.  As the “Urban Professionals [get] off the stage” Barry feels that their heads are already inflating and “that unless [they] hold their egos in check, keep this thing in perspective, we could start having the kind of internal conflicts that broke up the Beatles, another very good band.”  By saying that the same type of internal conflicts are beginning to occur in Barry’s Tupperware band that broke up the Beatle’s, Barry is using sarcasm to belittle the dramatics of a very famous and successful band.  Barry is also using sarcasm to undermine the talent of the Beatles by calling them a “good band” and putting his own band in the same category as the Beatles. 

            Similes are also a main staple of Barry’s subtle argument that the musical profession is a profession that has been made a sacred cow.  Barry doesn’t just degrade the musical profession; he also degrades the dance profession by comparing Lou, one of the “dancers” in Barry’s band, to a “Krispy Kreme jelly doughnut”.          By calling Lou, an overweight, middle-aged man, a dancer, Barry once again mocks an occupation that is overvalued by our society.  True dancers spend hours and hours practicing their techniques and timing, but Barry effectively undermines these efforts with one stroke of his pen.  Barry also compares Lou and Tom, the other “dancer” in his band, to the “The Temptations” as they “[wave] their Tupperware products in what they presumably thought was unison.”  The Temptations are a highly respected and well known singing group that broke through many barriers in their time through much hard work and dedication.  By comparing two uncoordinated goofballs like Lou and Tom to such a successful group, Barry cannot claim that he is doing anything but ridiculing the music profession.

            Barry has a definitive style in all of his writings and this article is no exception.  Through a fluid use of contrasting tones, sarcasm, and similes Barry belittles the careers of musicians and dancers.  Not only does Barry successfully claim, in a humorous manner, that the music industry is something to be mocked, he also questions the integrity of society.  Society is responsible for the over glorification of these careers and professions, therefore it is society’s ignorance that has led to such a meaningless past time becoming as idolized as the music industry has become.         

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Kill 'Em! Crush 'Em! Eat 'Em Raw!

1.  John McMurty's essay begins with a personal anecdote about the results of playing sports-especially football-since childhood.  When he can no longer ignore his physical condition, he seeks treatment and is hospitalized.  How does the anecdote lend credibility to his argument?

John McMurty establishes ethos through the use of his anecdote by stating the nature of his occupation.  He explains that he bagan to notice his injury "when [he] reached for any sort of large book".  This statement alone signals to the reader that McMurty's job involves a great deal of academic knowledge and understanding since he is consistenly recquiring the assistance of "large books".  McMurty goes on to establish his specific occupation - "a philosophy teacher at the University of Guelph".  This job title establishes the fact that McMurty is a highly educated man, thus establishing a sense of credibility or ethos.

2.  Paragraphs 5-7 compare and contrast football and war.  Is this comparison convincing?  How does the comparison appeal to logos?

McMurty creates a convincing comparison between football and war by stating the similarity of their languages and their principles.  McMurty does not ask his ausience to take his word for either.  He gives specific examples of the common vocabulary shared between war and football.  "Field general," "long bomb,"take a shot;" front line," pursuit," "good hit," and "the draft" are specific examples that McMurty provides his readers.  He also provides his readers with examples of the common principles.  These examples include such things as, "mass hysteria, the art of intimidation, absolute command and total obedience, territorrial aggression, censorship, inflated insignia and propaganda, blackboard maneuvers and strategies, drills, uniforms, formations, marching band, and training camps."  This argument appeals to logos by presenting facts and fact based opinions.

6.  Consider the language of football, especially the words shared by the military.  What sports other than football have a militaristic side?

Not all sports have a militaristic vocabulary but they do have a militaristic mind set.  Every sport, from ballet to football, recquires extreme self discipline, respect for leaders, ability to perservere, and many hours of dedicated practice.  In sports and in the military there is no quitting, no whinning, and no disrespect.  Some of these militaristic motifs are good things, however, some are not.  High school athletes should not worry for their physical safety as much as an officer in the army. 

7.  Who is McMurty's audience?  Is it necessary for the reader to understand or care about football in order to understand what McMurty is saying about society?  Explain.

McMurty is writing to everyone in society but could possibly be specifically writing to the parents of high school athletes.  The reader does not have to specifically care about football in order to grasp the purpose of McMurty's article.  He is explicitly writing to speak of the nature of society to let a game become more than just a game and society's willingness to allow young men and women to become injured in the name of the gam.